Automoblog Book Garage: Ford Model T Coast to Coast

Automoblog Book Garage: Ford Model T Coast to Coast Ginormous pancakes at the Viking Grill, the first Casey’s General Store, and a top secret World War II base: all on the itinerary for author Tom Cotter and photographer Michael Alan Ross in Ford Model T Coast to Coast. The book is a retelling of their cross-country adventure: a nearly 4,000-mile journey through the heart of America in a 1926 Ford Model T named “Something Special.”
Slow Ride
Ford Model T Coast to Coast is really about people and the connections they share with their communities. Cotter and Ross ask what happens when cars are completely autonomous? This is the very premise of the book. Will we lose not only the thrill of driving, but the ability to relate to our fellow humans?
“Sure, the built-in GPS system will get us to our destinations efficiently, but in the process it will also bypass the little treasures we can discover in out-of-the-way places,” Cotter writes before departing out across 13 states on the famous Lincoln Highway. “The fast roads bypass all that is unique about America.”
Photo: Michael Alan Ross.
Human Touch
In Ford Model T Coast to Coast those unique people and places include Bob and Debbie Altizer, proprietors of the Lincoln Motor Court which takes visitors back in time; Kyle Bond who after following in his father’s footsteps, is keeping a small Nebraska town on the map; and Jimmy Jaynes who makes the massive pancakes at the Viking Grill.
We meet them and so many more “keepers of the flame.”
Maintaining the old Model T for the 4,000-mile journey was not without its challenges, but for Cotter and Ross – and for those who appreciate a Sunday drive any day of the week – it’s worth it. As technology continues to progress, we may not have many more opportunities like this.
Ford Model T Coast to Coast: A Slow Drive across a Fast Country is available through Amazon and Motorbooks.
Photo: Michael Alan Ross.
Author
Cotter is the founder of the Cotter Group, an automotive public relations and marketing agency representing some of the biggest names in NASCAR, IndyCar, drag racing, and road racing. In his early years, he was an auto mechanic and salesman, later heading the PR department at Charlotte Motor Speedway. Cotter’s work has been featured before in our Book Garage series, 50 Shades of Rust and Cuba’s Car Culture being among our favorites.
Photographer
Michael Alan Ross is a photographer who sees what turns enthusiasts on about cars. His work has been featured in advertising campaigns, auto magazines, and corporate photography collections in the United States and Europe.
Ford Model T Coast to Coast Gallery











Check out these Automotive tips

Powered by WPeMatico

http://carsecret.atspace.eu/blog/automoblog-book-garage-ford-model-t-coast-to-coast/

Could The Mazda Miata Outpace One of History’s Greatest Muscle Cars?

Could The Mazda Miata Outpace One of History’s Greatest Muscle Cars? We here at Automoblog are good pals with these guys at RealMazdaParts.com. I’m not sure exactly how they do it, but every so often they ask hilarious questions and put out some highly entertaining infographics. In this case: Could a 2018 Mazda MX-5 Miata outrun a 1970 Chevelle 454 SS?
The answer, if you think about it, is actually pretty obvious, but it does also lead us to consider that our heroes of old were not that heroic.
The short answer is yes, a new Miata is “faster” than a Chevelle 454 SS. Or at least it would be around an AutoX course. But that’s obvious, isn’t it? A Chevelle 454 SS weighs nearly twice what a Miata does, it has a suspension better suited to a hay wagon, and don’t get me started on its braking capabilities.
Handling Versus Horsepower
But this is the old “different horses for different courses” argument. Of course a Miata is going to beat the living daylights out of a 454 SS on an AutoX course. That’s what Miatas are made to do. That sort of contest is inherently biased in the Miata’s favor. Shoot, a Miata could probably beat an AA Fuel dragster in a quarter-mile drag race, if the rules were to go halfway down the strip, turn around, and then come back.
If you look at the handy dandy little chart from RealMazdaParts.com (also seen below) it’s amazing how close both cars are in some areas. The zero to 60 times are pretty close, with the Chevy losing out by 0.3 seconds. The exact opposite is true in the quarter mile, with the SS beating the MX-5 by more than a second.
But, in the drag contest, the big block Chevelle has three times the horsepower and more than three times the torque of the Miata . . . which corresponds into more top end which, as always, corresponds to lower ETs down that asphalt strip baby!
With the optional LS-6 454 big-block V8, the Chevelle SS could surpass 100 mph in 13.3 seconds. Photo: GM Media Archive.
Vintage Versus Contemporary
If you look a little deeper, what this really brings into stark contrast is that the “good old days” weren’t all that good. You’ll run into lots of old timers these days, talking about how cool things used to be, back in the 1960s, in the muscle car era. They talk about it like it’s some sort of golden era, never to be attained again.
Talk about looking at the past through rose-tinted racing goggles.
You look at the performance specs for cars across the board from the mid-century, and they’re not all that impressive. At least from today’s vantage point. Sure, back in 1967, a Pontiac GTO was an impressive car. Was. Sure, a Chevelle 454 SS was the top of the Chevy muscle car heap, Camaros and Vettes not really counting, which is good, since they could be even faster. Yes, the Chevelle could run with Buick Grand Sports and Hemi ‘Cudas and such, but today?
Look at the figures. A 2019 Dodge Charger puts out roughly the same amount of power and will go from zero to 60 in 4.4 seconds. That is 1.7 seconds faster than a 454 SS. And the Charger is a four door (for some terrible reason). And the real cherry on top? A new Charger can get over 20 mpg (some as high as 30) on the highway. You will never see that kind of mileage with a big-block Chevelle. Never.
Shoot, you’d be lucky to get it out of the single digits with any of your vintage muscle cars.
Photo: Mazda North American Operations.
Penny For Your Thoughts
What can I say, cars are objectively better today than they were half a century ago. That, of course, does not mean they are more fun. That’s subjective and up to the eye of the beholder.
The only thing that gets me, and I mean really gets me, from this chart is that when you adjust for inflation, the Chevelle is about $7,000 less than a new MX-5. Inflation adjusted, a 454 Chevelle SS would sell for a little under $23,000. 23-thousand! Have you ever seen what these things go for on Hemmings?
Don’t go look. You don’t wanna know. It’s downright chilling.
Tony Borroz has spent his entire life racing antique and sports cars. He is the author of Bricks & Bones: The Endearing Legacy and Nitty-Gritty Phenomenon of The Indy 500, available in paperback or Kindle format. His forthcoming new book The Future In Front of Me, The Past Behind Me will be available soon. Follow his work on Twitter: @TonyBorroz
 




Check out these Automotive tips

Powered by WPeMatico

http://carsecret.atspace.eu/blog/could-the-mazda-miata-outpace-one-of-historys-greatest-muscle-cars/

The Battle For Generation Z In The Small SUV Market

The Battle For Generation Z In The Small SUV Market It’s seems like every generation in the United States has caught sport utility vehicle fever. SUVs sell like hotcakes and it makes sense. SUVs are that super-practical, do-anything machine for the 21st century. It’s not uncommon to hear about baby boomers getting a small SUV in the interest of downsizing, or GenXers opting for something larger and more luxurious as they move through their prime earning years.
Millennials are no exception either as they pass into their formative earning and family-raising years.
And while large, luxurious SUVs have their appeal, their smaller counterparts – often referred to as compact utility vehicles – are catching on with younger buyers.
“We see the emerging entry CUV segment growing at a very fast rate and the industry has seen customers looking for CUV body styles over sedans,” said Tyler Graves, Planner – Chief Marketing Manager, Nissan North America. “CUVs offer the fuel efficiency of small cars while offering additional versatility and cargo space.”
“Saving money drives the younger buyer in their choice,” added Michelle Krebs, Executive Analyst, Autotrader. “Smaller vehicles have smaller price tags and sip less gas.”
Untapped Potential
Generation Z, the cohort after millennials, made up 25 percent of the U.S. population in 2015 according to Forbes. Generation Z consists of those born from the mid-1990s to the early 2000s, and is a larger cultural sect than baby boomers or millennials. Like millennials, they are shaping new models of mobility, which sometimes spurs the idea that younger audiences will forgo car ownership all together.
However, a 2016 study on Generation Z from Kelly Blue Book and Autotrader found otherwise. In that study, 92 percent stated they plan to own a vehicle one day.
“They favored Honda, Chevrolet, and Ford as they see those brands as traditional, practical, and trusted,” Krebs explained. “The zero to now 19 crowd will make up 23 percent of the population with $3.2 trillion in purchasing power by 2020.”
“Baby boomers, Gen Xers, millennials – everybody wants their SUV, and Gen Z is no different,” added Erich Merkle, Ford U.S. Sales Analyst.
Ford has studied SUV ownership among the generational cohorts before, and projects that U.S. sales of subcompact SUVs among those 18 to 24 will surpass those of subcompact cars as early as next year. Ford’s research shows that just four years ago, that same age group purchased 8,121 subcompact cars and only 443 subcompact SUVs. Last year the tables turned as those consumers purchased 3,981 subcompact cars and 2,840 subcompact SUVs – a 541 percent leap for subcompact SUVs.
“As more new small SUVs like the Ford EcoSport become available, you’ll see the subcompact SUV segment continue to climb as a popular new car of choice for first-time buyers,” Merkle said.
Ford EcoSport. Photo: Ford Motor Company.
Connected Cultures & Long Roads
Securing a slice of Generation Z pie is paramount for automakers, and the market is now flooded with new CUV offerings pointed directly at today’s youth. In order to further attract them, Ford has made things like in-vehicle Wi-Fi, multiple charging ports, and various smartphone compatible entertainment systems a priority. The new EcoSport is already compatible with Amazon Alexa, Apple CarPlay, and Android Auto.
“To Gen Z buyers, connectivity is everything,” said Karen Sullivan, Ford EcoSport Brand Marketing Manager. “Their car serves as an extension of their phone and their home, and we’re seeing an exciting response from these young customers to our all-new EcoSport.”
Ford is strategic in their engineering and marketing of the EcoSport, focusing on the vehicle’s fuel efficiency, cargo space, connectivity options, and price but Kerbs believes nothing will happen overnight.
“Ford faces a challenge with the EcoSport and has their work cut out in terms of making inroads in the subcompact segment,” she explained. “The EcoSport must establish its name; it currently lacks consumer awareness and the name itself is confused with Ford’s EcoBoost.”
Photo: Ford Motor Company.
Finding The Mark
According to Krebs, the Jeep Renegade, Compass, and Honda HRV are among the strongest competition for Ford, and each see more user traffic on Kelley Blue Book than the EcoSport.
“In our Kelley Blue Book Brand Watch, a metric that measures brand health down to the model level, the Ford EcoSport does not lead in any of the nearly two dozen attributes we measure, including the three most important,” she continued. “Our analysis shows the most important attributes to shoppers in the subcompact utility segment are durability, safety, and affordability.”
Krebs believes Ford should continue to expand their tech offerings for the fledgling EcoSport, but not at the expense of other important aspects younger buyers will inevitably consider. The Kelley Blue Book Brand Watch metric concluded the EcoSport did not offer as many safety features, had lower fuel economy, and was higher in terms of sticker price at $19,995 (destination and other fees not included) than the competition. 
“Ford needs to find ways to promote the EcoSport, especially to younger, likely urban buyers, to build awareness,” Krebs said. “They need to focus on the aspects in the segment that matter – especially value – and then layer the technology on top of those basics.”
Photo: Ford Motor Company.
Satisfied Customer
Ford stands by the price point, saying the EcoSport’s 1.0-liter engine with its EPA-estimated 28 combined mpg has already attracted younger buyers.
“I’d never heard of EcoSport, but I loved it the minute I saw it,” said Kelly Oswald, 19, one of the first owners.
Oswald, a suburban Baltimore college student, represents a growing link between Generation Z and subcompact SUVs. Last year, 11.3 percent of those 18 to 24 who purchased a new SUV purchased a subcompact one, up two percent from five years earlier.
“I went in looking to buy an used car,” she continued. “I didn’t expect there to be an affordable option to buy a new car.”
Although Oswald may be ahead of the curve.
“That age group, regardless of generation, does not typically buy a new vehicle for a first car,” Krebs said. “They generally drive an used car that might be a hand-me-down from their family.”
2018 Nissan Kicks: Photo: Nissan North America.
Kick Start
The Nissan Kicks, another new entry, was introduced last year during the Los Angeles Auto Show as the sixth member of the company’s SUV and crossover lineup. The S trim begins at $17,990, the SV at $19,690, and the SR at $20,290. The Kicks is standard with Automatic Emergency Braking, RearView Monitor, and seven air bags. SV and SR grades add Blind Spot Warning and Rear Cross Traffic Alert.
“The new Kicks is designed to fit the needs of singles or couples looking for expressive styling, personal technology, smart functionality, and advanced safety features at an affordable price starting under $18,000,” explained Michael Bunce, Vice President, Product Planning, Nissan North America, Inc.
Although, like the EcoSport, the Kicks faces an uphill battle in its newness.
“It’s becoming very crowded with entries,” Krebs said of the CUV segment. “There are some all-new ones – Nissan’s is the Kicks – but also some that have been there for a bit and have stronger brand names.”
Nissan doesn’t dispute the market’s little breathing room but remains confident.
“The segment is becoming increasingly competitive with new entrants,” Graves said. “However, we’re very optimistic about Kicks and the value we’re able to offer customers.”
Photo: Nissan North America.
Forward Looking
According to the automaker’s U.S. sales report for May 2018, overall sales of Nissan crossovers, trucks, and SUVs were up four percent. The Rogue lead the way, with a May record of 38,413 units, up 18 percent. However, Nissan noted that total May sales stood at 131,832 units, a decrease of 4 percent compared to 2017.
The Kicks, as it is just arriving, was not included in the report, although a long-term strategy is in play.
“We expect Kicks buyers to have a great experience with the safety and technology that we are offering,” Graves said. “We believe that Kicks will attract younger buyers and we hope to see them eventually move up our lineup as their needs progress.”
The Kicks tops the EcoSport in EPA fuel economy ratings (33 mpg combined versus the aforementioned 28) and has a lower price point, beginning just under $18,000 versus near $20,000 for the EcoSport. The Kicks is one of the best offerings in the segment in terms of these two factors.
Photo: Nissan North America.
Combined Approach
The Honda HR-V, although still relatively new, is a bit more established, having been on the market for three years now. While the HR-V is pointed toward Generation Z, Honda has taken into account older millennials.
“The Honda HR-V was developed with men and women between the ages of 18 and 34 in mind,” explained Jessica Pawl, Media Relations Manager, American Honda. “The HR-V is designed for people with active lifestyles who want a vehicle that makes their lives easy, but want to enjoy getting where they’re going.”
Honda’s HR-V team went for flexible packaging, efficiency, and overall value when engineering the vehicle.
“It’s fuel efficient, fun to drive, and features advanced safety technology,” Pawl continued. “It’s very well rounded and affordable, featuring the dynamics of our best sedans and the functionality of our most practical cars.”
“The HR-V benefits from the very strong brand image of Honda,” Krebs added.
The 2018 HR-V starts at $19,570, with two-wheel drive models earning an EPA-rating of 31 combined and all-wheel drive variants coming in at 28 combined. The HR-V was the number two seller in the segment last year, being edged out by the Subaru Crosstrek. Honda’s long-term strategy is similar to Nissan’s.
“Honda’s balanced portfolio offers buyers the opportunity to grow within the brand, moving up in vehicle size as their family grows and needs adjust,” Pawl said.
Photo: Honda North America.
Future Considerations
CBT Automotive Network notes in this January feature that Generation Z is more tech oriented than millennials and will likely not recall a time without Wi-Fi, smartphones, social media, and any number of streaming services. It’s something the automotive industry needs to be cognizant of as they approach this now rather large and significant cohort.
Despite a competitive CUV segment and the potential there for automakers, how many eggs to place in that basket is open to debate. As manufacturers use entry-level CUVs as a means to introduce younger audiences to their brand, it’s important to consider how these buyers, especially Generation Z, differ from others. While automakers have the best intentions, there is no guarantee these younger buyers will remain loyal, especially with so many rising stars in the SUV and CUV universe.
“The segment remains unclear as to how big it will be,” Krebs said. “They definitely want to own a car, but counting on Gen Z to drive sales of any new vehicle is misplaced, particularly in light of how cost-conscious they are.”
Carl Anthony is Managing Editor of Automoblog and resides in Detroit, Michigan. He studies mechanical engineering at Wayne State University, serves on the Board of Directors for the Ally Jolie Baldwin Foundation, and is a loyal Detroit Lions fan.
Photos & Source: Ford Motor Company, Nissan North America, Honda North America.



Check out these Automotive tips

Powered by WPeMatico

http://carsecret.atspace.eu/blog/the-battle-for-generation-z-in-the-small-suv-market/

2018 Honda Fit: Little But Kinda Big

2018 Honda Fit: Little But Kinda Big

The Honda Fit, besides having an adorably Japanese name (seriously, who would name a car that? The same society that would name one of their cars the Bongo Friendly, I suppose) aims to be nearly all things to a certain slice of the population pie. The Fit wants to be small enough for the urban environment, yet big enough for four adults (five in a pinch).
Small, miserly on gas, yet practical and a hatchback so it can haul a modicum of stuff. Usually, trying to spread yourself this thin is a recipe for disaster (see Aztek, Pontiac) yet somehow, Honda makes it work.
Modestly Misplaced
No, I am not going to say you can take the Fit on The Great American Road Trip, jazz blaring on the stereo, visions of Kerouac and Cassady flashing through your brain in the middle of the great American middle. The Fit might be a number of things, and do a number of them well, but blasting through Montana, say, at 80 miles an hour is not one of them. The Fit is roomy, but you need more vroom, dig?
This is the third-generation Fit to hit the road in America and the first real update since the 2015 model. What it is, in general terms, is Honda’s version of the VW Golf or the Toyota Yaris, only oddly different somehow. The Fit always had odd styling and, as Honda has gotten more sedately extreme in their styling these days, the Fit has gone right along with it. Only it doesn’t work as well. Or at least it doesn’t work as a unified whole.
Have you ever seen one of those kids, and they’re kind of puppy like? They are gangly and their arms and legs are too long and their facial features are all over the place; ears and eyes and nose too big, way too much hair, even when it’s cut, that sort of thing? It’s like a size 5 person dropped onto a size 2 frame. Too much stuff on too small an area; that’s what the Fit always looked like to me. If the Fit was 20 percent bigger – longer wheelbase, taller, wider – all of the many, many design elements crammed onto it would work much better. However, what all Fits do in opposition to that is Work with a capital “W.” They are amazingly well thought out, practical, and useful despite their diminutive size.
2018 Honda Fit EX-L. Photo: Honda North America.


Functional Safety
The 2018 Fit gets a fully fresh look for 2018 and the addition of a new trim level, Sport in this case, and the availability of Honda Sensing. Honda Sensing is, according to the automaker, “our exclusive intelligent suite of safety and driver-assistive technologies designed to alert you to things you might miss while driving.” To put that in plain English, Honda Sensing is the by-now-ubiquitous suite of electronic nannies, sensors, and actuators that aim to save us from ourselves. So be it.
Styling Treatments
The 2018 Fit gets updated styling front and rear, and more color this time around for an “enhanced, youthful, sporty, and emotional character,” says Honda. The new styling aims to be sportier, starting at the very nose of the beast with a horizontal, two-piece grille done up in chrome and piano black with a large “H” dead center. Honda also says the headlights are “more integrated and sophisticated” and designed to blend into the side edges of the upper fascia. The Fit continues along this trend, moving the headlights up and back, back, way back along the fender line. Not saying this is bad, but if we’re not careful, headlights will be on the A pillars by 2021.
Out back, the Fit carries through with the new low and wide styling to keep things sporty. The 2018 rear bumper has been redesigned and features a full-width character line in piano black. There’s a new taillight combo on the Fit’s redesigned rear end too, plus a splitter-shaped lower section. Note that’s “splitter-shaped,” not an actual splitter. But who cares? It’s not like this thing will be going fast enough to really start working the underbody airflow for maximum downforce, y’know?
2018 Honda Fit Sport. Photo: Honda North America.
Sport Package
Now, about that new Sport trim level. Sport falls between the LX and EX trims and features an even more aggressive and sporty look with aero bits at the front, sides, and rear along with a front splitter highlighted in bright orange. At the rear there is a three-strake diffuser with a bright orange upper trim line (probably as ghastly as the one up front) and a chrome exhaust.
No word on pricing or exact availability or any of that jazz just yet, only Honda’s corp-speak: “more in-depth information about the upgrades to the 2018 Fit, including expanded feature content will be provided in the near future.” At the very least, we know the 2018 Honda Fit will hit dealerships next month.
Tony Borroz has spent his entire life racing antique and sports cars. He means well, even if he has a bias towards lighter, agile cars rather than big engine muscle cars or family sedans.



Check out these Automotive tips

Powered by WPeMatico

http://carsecret.atspace.eu/blog/2018-honda-fit-little-but-kinda-big/

Is Lincoln The Watered Down Cadillac?

Is Lincoln The Watered Down Cadillac?

Lincoln is, by this point in its life, a very strange company. At one time, they were the ride of choice for Presidents and rockstars and mobsters. The Kennedys, Pete Townsend, and the Corleones all had a thing for Lincolns. They were credibly going toe-to-toe with Cadillac for the pinnacle of huge American luxury cars that said to the world, “I have made it! Look who I am! I drive a Lincoln!”
That is a vibe even Cadillac struggles to maintain in the minds of customers younger than 74, but what does Lincoln hope to hang on to?
Loyal Faults
Loyalty. In a word, loyalty. At least if the latest missive from Lincoln is to be taken seriously. And honestly, I have no reason at all to doubt this. It’s not that Lincolns are screwed together so poorly that lack of quality is a problem. They are, without a doubt, very well assembled using very high quality materials. The problem here is with touting, “Lincoln has the luxury segment’s highest loyalty rate among new luxury-vehicle buyers in the first quarter of 2017, according to IHS Markit Loyalty data.” It’s not so much a problem with the information, but how loudly Ford’s luxury brand is trumpeting fairly equivocal facts.
It’s as if Lincoln were that kid in high school saying, “did you know that I am the second relief quarterback on the JV football team? Lots of potential there. And also, Mr. Johnson, the band director, said that I might make third chair trumpet this year. So what-a-ya say? Go to the prom with me?” It’s not as if those things are false; it’s the desperation at their foundation that makes it a worrying pitch for a prom date, but especially for a luxury car.
Lincoln sales are up 6 percent this year, outpacing a luxury segment that is up 2 percent, according to Lincoln and industry reported sales data. However, is that enough to sustain the brand? Photo: Lincoln Motor Company.
Packed Field
And look at the statement they are hanging all this on: “Lincoln has the luxury segment’s highest loyalty rate among new luxury-vehicle buyers in the first quarter of 2017, according to IHS Markit Loyalty data.” That’s three qualifiers in a rather tepid statement. In so many words, Lincoln is saying “hey, people who have never bought an expensive car before sure like our product, if they bought in the first three months of this year at any rate.”
And this is really sad. Not just because Lincolns are put together well and use high quality materials like I mentioned above: No, it’s sad because Lincoln is “the alternative Cadillac.” Lincoln is literally the only domestic alternative to Caddy. If you are a relatively patriotic car buyer, and you’ve just hit the big time, what are your choices? Two: Cadillac or Lincoln. There was a time when there were dozens of top American luxury cars to choose from. Not just Cadillac, but Duesenberg, and Cord and Auburn and Pierce Arrow and Packard and Lincoln. Back when Cadillac’s company motto was “The Standard of The World” they weren’t kidding, and they were right. People from all over the world looked up to, admired and desired Cadillacs. Now? Well, Cadillac has been saying for decades, “Hey! Hey, over here! Pay attention to us! Why buy German? Get a Caddy!”
Even Buick is attempting a complete turnaround.
2017 Lincoln Continental. Photo: Lincoln Motor Company.
Second Best
Whither Lincoln? They can’t even say that. The best they can come up with is, “we’re not Cadillac, but we’re still American! Oh, and new buyers of our cars love us.” If that sort of attitude doesn’t make the higher-ups at FoMoCo shudder and have visions of what happened to Mercury dancing in their heads, I don’t know what will.
And I’m not here to pillory Lincoln. I actually like them. I always have. They’re big and square and have a presence close to a Brink’s truck. Why would I, if I were in the market for something huge and American and over-engined and luxury stuffed, not consider a Lincoln? Because Lincoln is a B- answer in comparison to what Cadillac produces. Being nearly as good is never, ever a way to sell more of your stuff, let alone a sound business strategy.
2017 Lincoln Continental interior layout. Photo: Lincoln Motor Company.


New Strategies
If Lincoln wants to survive, and I really hope they do, they need to get off the dime now. They need to start producing cars that make Caddys look like half-thought out parts-bin specials. Lincoln needs to start dropping in blown Shelby Mustang plants into their capacious engine bays. Have the guys that designed the Ford GT’s suspension have a go at the Lincoln’s chassis. They already have the comfort and convenience stuff down, so go for the performance angle. Make it work, and then beat Cadillac over the head with it.
Shoot, why not go all the way? Why not resurrect Mercury as Lincoln’s performance division, the way Mercedes-Benz has AMG and Audi has their S models? You already have the name right there. He’s even the Roman god associated with speed and financial gain. Use it. Drop the big mills into the Continentals, only calmed and quieted for the stock broker crowd, but put the same engine into the “Mercury” division aimed at the patriotic middle-aging Vin Diesels of America. Pull out sound deadening, make things stiffer, and get marketing on board. Remake the hot rod Lincoln and find some down-right, true-blue American rockstar to be your spokesperson. Shoot, Detroit is crawling with American rock stars. Use one of them.
What’s Iggy Pop doing these days? He’d be perfect. He’s even from Detroit.
Tony Borroz has spent his entire life racing antique and sports cars. He means well, even if he has a bias towards lighter, agile cars rather than big engine muscle cars or family sedans.



Check out these Automotive tips

Powered by WPeMatico

http://carsecret.atspace.eu/blog/is-lincoln-the-watered-down-cadillac/

70,000 miles with a Volvo C30 in Vermont

70,000 miles with a Volvo C30 in Vermont The Volvo C30 does battle with a VW Golf GTI while being lifeless at the same time

I never followed up with an update on life with the 2009 Volvo C30 R-Design that I eluded to in this piece, so let’s jump forward three years. The C30 has not grown on me since I purchased it. I had low overall expectations, and they have stayed there. It corners and accelerates as well as a GTI and comes with a 6-speed manual transmission. After 70,000 miles with this car, it’s clear that Volvo could have easily sold more of these if they had chosen to make the driving experience a bit more raw. The cost to own this car was the biggest surprise, given it’s a Ford Focus with a serving of 90’s Volvo mechanicals and a splash of Mazda 3. Let’s first jump into what it’s like to live with everyday from driving to practicality:

It’s measurably quick, but deadpan about it.
The shifter is vague, the flywheel is heavy, the pedals are poorly spaced for heel-and-toeing, mechanical grip is high with little feedback, the engine is silent, and the cabin is silent—the NVH difference between 55 mph and 90 mph is negligible. All of this works because the sound deadening and aerodynamics are quite effective, the suspension is well thought out and provides neutral handling, all of the tires have a little bit of negative camber, and there’s that turbo plugged into Volvo’s famed modular 2.5 liter 5-cylinder. The root of the issue is that there is no feeling of engagement for the driver—until the car is chucked well into a “reckless driving/endangerment” condition—the steering feels dead and the motor only starts to make a vacuum-cleaner like drone at 4,000 rpm. The only perennial weak point on paper is the brakes, which have a spongy pedal and can be prone to moderate fade if thrashed.













Get a nice rack, you won’t regret it.
I live in Vermont and this car replaced a Volvo 850 T-5 wagon. The Volvo C30 has 20 cubic feet of space with the seats folded down—the 850 has 65 cubes—and the C30 only manages 12.9 cubes with the two bucket seats in their upright position. Despite the lack of space, a set of Thule Aeroblades and ski racks meant mid-day escapes from the office to the nordic center effortless (mixed driving gas mileage drops from 30 mpg to 26 mpg). For two persons, the storage behind the rear seats  is enough for wintertime dayhiking.The rear buckets are actually quite comfortable and offer excellent support while cornering—though egress is tedious. For couples with an outdoor lifestyle and no kids, this car is entirely practical. 

Think of the sex appeal (and mental toughness required) of buttering a cold waffle.
The Volvo C30 is front-heavy, the wheelbase is short, and all-around negative camber conspires to make this a handful in the snow. With 1-year-old Hakkapeliitta snow tires on it, “twitchy” is the order of the day. Cornering is on the oversteer side of things and driving along over straight but collapsed sections of roadway causes things get sideways quickly. Have I passed out-of-state folks spinning their all-season tires in their SUVs up a hill from a full stop in this two-wheel-drive low-clearance car? Of course, but that’s all down to the tires. Oh, and while we’re on the subject, it was a masterstroke for Volvo to put the DSTC (traction control) switch on the turn signal stalk.

$3,000/year to maintain a dolled-up Ford Focus?
The car clearly doesn’t provide “all of the feels”, or whatever it is kids are saying these days, but what is it like to maintain? Volvo’s been using the 5-banger since 1993, this is not the first rodeo for Getrag’s M66 transmission with Volvo, and, let’s face it, this is really a dolled up Ford Focus. The truth is sharp—$3,000/year in maintenance for 20,000 miles per year. This includes largely DIY and independent work, though some things like the clutch were farmed out to the dealer. Much of the funds have gone to tires and suspension. The driving has been spirited and it’s hard to get anywhere near 30,000 miles on a set of tires. This is partially down to the stock suspension setup for which Volvo issued a service bulletin, merely advising technicians that because of the car’s mild negative camber, that it would regularly eat through the inside of tires. It’s great for those using directional tires, not so great for those using asymmetrical tires.

The interior doesn’t age.
For all of the negative issues, the positives make this car pretty competitive in its class. The interior is spartan without being cheap and has defied the test of time in a way that economy and luxury cars seem to always fail. Apart from vacuuming light-colored dirt out of the black carpet, Volvo designed the interior to be free of overly shiny surfaces and ‘magnets’ for wear. Buy nearly any car on the market today, drive it for a full day, and the interior will appear ‘lived in’ at the end of the day. Volvo has managed to evade this, and it’s hard to give them enough credit for doing so.

Conclusions
After a long day at the office or a long day out, dropping into the car still feels like a quiet, contemporary sanctuary. The front and rear seats are great for average to small-sized folks, it’s quiet, the stereo isn’t bad for an entry level stereo, and the interior pieces doesn’t rattle incessantly over bumps. Having all of 236 ft-lbs of torque available at 1,500 rpm never gets old.
In today’s car market if you ask for an ample, flat torque curve, a manual transmission, headlamp washers, heated leather seats, an attractive, but low-maintenance interior and unusual styling, you may find there just aren’t many cars out there like this anymore, certainly not for this car’s original asking price of $30,000, I just wish it was alive.
-By: Sawyer Sutton
 

























All photos © 2017, Sawyer Sutton, egmCarTech
The post Long-Term Review: The experience of 70,000 miles in a 2009 Volvo C30 in Vermont appeared first on egmCarTech.



Check out these Automotive tips

Powered by WPeMatico

http://carsecret.atspace.eu/blog/70000-miles-with-a-volvo-c30-in-vermont/

Letter From The UK: A Breed Apart

Letter From The UK: A Breed Apart


A small green jewel of an island in the middle of the Irish Sea is home to one of the most exciting and nerve-shredding Motorsports events anywhere on the planet. Although it is part of the United Kingdom, the Isle Of Man has its own parliament and government which have competence over all domestic matters.
This makes a difference.
The Race
As long ago as 1907, a group of enthusiasts decided they would stage an “auto-cycle” race around the island and thus, the Tourist Trophy was born. Today, Tourist Trophy Week attracts riders and supporters from all over the world. Handily, TT also stands for Time Trial which is what this race is.
It is a two-wheeled spectacular; motorbike rider and machine pitting themselves against the clock on an island circuit comprised entirely of closed public roads. Competitors encounter stone walls, hedgerows, drain covers, and high curbs all of which are hard, unyielding, and deadly. The Snaefell Mountain Course is 37.73 miles long and races can comprise one to six laps, so the Senior TT bikes will cover 226 miles in one race and – I can’t stress this enough – the record for the average speed per 37.73 mile lap, AVERAGE, is currently 133.962mph. The men and women who wrestle these mighty machines around the lumpy, bumpy streets of the Isle of Man are truly a breed apart.
Death Ever Present
Tragically, scarcely a year goes by without someone getting killed in often a horrendous accident. One slip, one brush against a curb and all is lost. During this year’s TT competition which finished last week, it is sad to report that three riders died in crashes and a couple were injured and this is the point. In the UK generally the great gods of health & safety rule. They have their humorless clipboard-toting acolytes who go around preventing people from doing the things they enjoy. To say our nation is risk-averse is to put it mildly. If the authorities could make us all wear personal safety roll cages whenever we left the house they would.
The Isle of Man does it differently. They believe that, all reasonable safety precautions being taken, if riders want to put themselves at hazard then they should be allowed to do so. This is a mature and sensible attitude. Furthermore, the competitors and their families know the risks. It stares them in the face. If someone is killed there is usually a moment of reflection for other riders before their machine is pushed up to the start line. Over 200 motorcycle stalwarts have died over the years and yet still they come in their droves. The race week has never been so well supported.
The trouble is, if you like to go fast then it is in your blood. Many competitors crave the excitement and, yes, the fear, as a starving man would crave a piece of bread. The fact is that here on the cracked and broken mainlands of Britain and elsewhere in the world, much motor racing on two or four wheels has to an extent been slightly muted by rules and regulations. Nobody wants to bear witness to death but, in my view, racing has become, if not dull, at least a little pedestrian at times.
Isle Of Man TT. Photo: Creative Commons.
Racing Relics
Obviously, there’s still plenty of exciting motor racing around. The last race of this weekend’s British Touring Car Championship demonstrated that but, like an insidious disease, I worry slowly but surely the rot will set in. I can’t speak for the rules in the USA but to me it seems that American Motorsport appears less afflicted by the excesses of health and safety. I for one love to watch any NASCAR or IndyCar racing I can find on the television, but I can’t say the same about Formula One. Increasingly, the bloated and money-obsessed F1 circus is staged on brand new circuits that are like giant car parks with huge run-off areas and a boring track design that leaves spectators remote from the action.
Many of the grand old circuits of the past hardly get a look in now. Monaco survives, thanks to the glamour, but the days of seeing Grand Prix cars sweeping up the corkscrew that is Eau Rouge at Spa are long gone. Accidents by their very nature are just that. No one can predict the unknowable. Essentially what I am saying is that if we insist on yet another safety precaution every time someone dies, where does it end? How safe does Motorsport have to become before it turns into a parade?
Eau Rouge & Raidillon, Circuit de Spa-Francorchamps, October 1997. Photo: Creative Commons.


Good Old Days On Film
This writer recently watch a current documentary film about the New Zealand racer, Bruce McLaren. What struck me most was just how exciting the racing was in those gung-ho days. No track-side barriers, no run-off gravel areas, just man and machine dicing with the devil. History shows these racers were at the edge of the abyss yet they still pushed the limits. Technology has made our race cars safe for drivers which is good, but has it taken away the spirit of derring-do?
Need For Speed
The need for speed is in us, but eroded by society. The need to take risks is an urge laying dormant just below the veneer of our daily humdrum lives. This other breed embraces that urge fully. If you ask them why, they probably could not give a fully coherent answer. It’s the buzz, they say. It’s the charge. It’s the blast. Two wheels aren’t enough for me personally, but give me four and I get it.
Geoff Maxted is a motoring writer, photographer, and author of our Letter From The UK series. Follow his work on Twitter: @DriveWrite
Cover Photo: A. G. Lloyd-Jones.



Check out these Automotive tips

Powered by WPeMatico

http://carsecret.atspace.eu/blog/letter-from-the-uk-a-breed-apart/

General Motors Assembles First Round of Driverless Test Vehicles

General Motors Assembles First Round of Driverless Test Vehicles


General Motors recently announced the completed production of 130 self-driving Chevrolet Bolt EV test vehicles. The fleet is equipped with GM’s latest autonomous technology, and will join the more than 50 other Bolt EV test vehicles already in service.
Currently, GM is conducting testing in San Francisco, Scottsdale, and Detroit.
Future Goals
GM became the first automaker to assemble driverless test vehicles in a mass-production facility when the fleet of self-driving Chevrolet Bolt EV test vehicles began coming down the line at Orion Township Assembly in January.
“This production milestone brings us one step closer to making our vision of personal mobility a reality,” said GM Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Mary Barra.
Each Bolt EV test vehicle is equipped with LIDAR, cameras, sensors, and other components necessary for automated driving. GM will leverage the technology to further develop a safe and reliable fully automated vehicle.
“Expansion of our real-world test fleet will help ensure that our self-driving vehicles meet the same strict standards for safety and quality that we build into all of our vehicles,” Barra explained.
Partnership Approach
In March of last year, GM acquired Cruise Automation, a San Francisco company focused on autonomous driving programs and software. Chief Executive Officer Kyle Vogt believes the forthcoming fleet of Bolt EVs are essential.
“To achieve what we want from self-driving cars, we must deploy them at scale,” he said. “By developing the next-generation self-driving platform in San Francisco and manufacturing these cars in Michigan, we are creating the safest and most consistent conditions to bring our cars to the most challenging urban roads that we can find.”
GM and Cruise Automation have been testing driverless Bolt EVs on public roads in San Francisco and Scottsdale since June 2016. In January, the two companies began testing vehicles on public roads in Warren, Michigan. According to Cruise Automation’s website, the company is hiring additional engineers who are passionate about the field of automated driving.
Carl Anthony is Managing Editor of Automoblog and resides in Detroit, Michigan.
Photo: General Motors.
Photos & Source: General Motors, Cruise Automation.



Check out these Automotive tips

Powered by WPeMatico

http://carsecret.atspace.eu/blog/general-motors-assembles-first-round-of-driverless-test-vehicles/

Audi Demonstrates Piloted Driving Technology In New York

Audi Demonstrates Piloted Driving Technology In New York


Audi became the first automaker to showcase an automated vehicle in New York during an event near the state’s capital in Albany earlier today. The company demonstrated what they call Audi Highway Pilot technology, a Level 3 designation with regard to autonomous driving from the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). Those in attendance, including legislators, media, stakeholders, and their respective staffs received rides and in-depth demonstrations on the technology.
Currently, no vehicle on the road today surpasses Level 2 automation. Level 3, known as Conditional Automation, is a another step forward for proponents of automated driving.
“Audi, with the partnership of forward-thinking states like New York, are at the forefront of defining the future of transportation,” said Scott Keogh, President of Audi of America.
Sensor Fusion
Audi Highway Pilot technology is capable of sending a given vehicle to highway speeds when conditions allow. The system meets rigorous safety standards with its advanced sensors, cameras, lasers, and artificial intelligence. This “sensor fusion” approach allows the vehicle to control the acceleration, braking, and steering, while responding to road inputs without driver intervention. During the demonstrations, two Audi engineers were in the vehicle to monitor the system, ensure safety, and answer questions. The vehicle Audi used for the event has already recorded thousands of miles on limited access roads and highways across the United States.
Photo: Audi of America, Inc.
New Legislation
New York recently approved Audi to conduct autonomous testing within the state. Audi is the first automaker to receive approval since Governor Andrew Cuomo announced the state was accepting applications from companies interested in testing their autonomous vehicles on public roads. Furthermore, new legislation included in New York’s fiscal year 2018 budget accounts for testing driverless technology via a year-long pilot program. Proponents of automated driving point to a range of benefits: improved infrastructure, reduced emissions, and accident-free roads chief among them.
“That kind of innovation only happens with industry and government working hand-in-hand toward a shared goal of safer roads,” Keogh said.
Carl Anthony is Managing Editor of Automoblog and resides in Detroit, Michigan.
Levels of automated driving as defined by SAE:
Level 0 – No Automation: The full-time performance by the human driver of all aspects of the dynamic driving task, even when enhanced by warning or intervention systems.
Level 1 – Driver Assistance: The driving mode-specific execution by a driver assistance system of either steering or acceleration/deceleration using information about the driving environment and with the expectation that the human driver performs all remaining aspects of the dynamic driving task.
Level 2 – Partial Automation: The driving mode-specific execution by one or more driver assistance systems of both steering and acceleration/deceleration using information about the driving environment and with the expectation that the human driver performs all remaining aspects of the dynamic driving task.
Level 3 – Conditional Automation: The driving mode-specific performance by an Automated Driving System of all aspects of the dynamic driving task with the expectation that the human driver will respond appropriately to a request to intervene.
Level 4 – High Automation: The driving mode-specific performance by an Automated Driving System of all aspects of the dynamic driving task, even if a human driver does not respond appropriately to a request to intervene.
Level 5 – Full Automation: The full-time performance by an Automated Driving System of all aspects of the dynamic driving task under all roadway and environmental conditions that can be managed by a human driver.
Photo & Source: Audi of America, Inc, Society of Automotive Engineers.



Check out these Automotive tips

Powered by WPeMatico

http://carsecret.atspace.eu/blog/audi-demonstrates-piloted-driving-technology-in-new-york/